THORChain
System income under the current documented fixed distribution
Compare what users pay, what the protocol controls, what holders receive, and which critical costs remain unknown.
Values are snapshots, not rankings. Hover or open a protocol page for the exact classification note. Missing values are never treated as zero.
Both facilitate exchange. One funds a native security-and-liquidity network; the other redirects selected AMM fees from LPs into a token-burn architecture.
System income under the current documented fixed distribution
v2 with protocol fees active: 0.25% LP fee and 0.05% protocol fee from a 0.30% total
THORChain must fund cross-chain security, liquidity, contributor shares, TCY, and burn. Uniswap's selected protocol fee primarily shifts income from LPs into the burn system.
THORChain splits token economics across RUNE utility/burn and TCY direct distribution. UNI capture is indirect through fee-funded burns.
THORChain node income is inside the protocol economy. Uniswap relies on each host chain's validators, whose gas income is outside the DEX statement.
A higher Uniswap protocol share directly lowers LP income. A higher THORChain fixed recipient share reduces the remainder available to nodes and LPs.
What if governance redirects more of the same 0.30% trader fee?
Assumption: This holds user fees and volume constant. It does not predict whether LPs or routers would react.