Cross-chain DEX · FLIP

Chainflip

Usage buys and burns the security token; validators are paid through issuance.

Fees paid by users · 30dObserved
$837.2K

Open-adapter total across LP and network fee components.

Gross protocol income · 30dObserved
$170K

Network fee value used for FLIP buy-and-burn in the adapter taxonomy.

Token-holder value · 30dObserved
$170K

Value of fees used to buy and burn FLIP; this is indirect holder value, not cash distribution.

Incentives / emissions · 30dSource conflict
Not available

DefiLlama reports zero incentives while official token-economics documentation describes ongoing validator emissions.

Money flow

Follow $100 of network fee

The network fee is taken in stable-value terms, used to buy FLIP through the protocol, and the purchased FLIP is burned.

$100The 0.10% network-fee component, not all trader fees
100% · FLIP buy-and-burn

Network fee buys FLIP, then permanently burns it

Curated rule

Read before comparing: LP pool fees are a separate trader charge and go to LPs. Validator emissions are a separate issuance flow and must be netted against burns when assessing supply.

Normalized statement

The same questions,
even when answers differ.

“Not available” is a result, not a blank. Atlas refuses to convert missing costs or conflicting emissions into a zero.

Economic line30-day valueEvidenceInterpretation
Fees paid by users (30d)$837.2KObserved

Open-adapter total across LP and network fee components.

Gross protocol income (30d)$170KObserved

Network fee value used for FLIP buy-and-burn in the adapter taxonomy.

Net protocol revenue (30d)Not availableNot available

Execution, gas, broker, and operating costs are not reconciled against the network fee on a matching basis.

Token-holder value (30d)$170KObserved

Value of fees used to buy and burn FLIP; this is indirect holder value, not cash distribution.

Liquidity-provider income (30d)$667.2KDerived

Residual after subtracting adapter-classified protocol income from total user fees.

Validator / node income (30d)Not availableNot available

Official docs describe validator emissions, but a reconciled USD 30-day amount was not retained.

Incentives and emissions (30d)Not availableSource conflict

DefiLlama reports zero incentives while official token-economics documentation describes ongoing validator emissions.

Treasury income (30d)Not availableNot available

The core swap network fee is burned rather than retained as a treasury inflow; other product flows are outside this DEX snapshot.

Accounting-style profit (30d)Not availableNot available

Burn value is not accounting profit, and operating expenses are not public on a matching basis.

DEX volume (30d)$288.5MObserved

Open-adapter spot swap volume.

Liquidity / TVL$12.8MObserved

Current protocol liquidity reported by the open adapter.

Token value capture

Programmatic buy-and-burn funded by swap volume

Every qualifying swap pays a network fee that buys and burns FLIP. More volume creates more buy pressure and supply reduction, all else equal.

Do not overstate it: The supply effect depends on both burns and validator issuance. Burn value is not a dividend and can be outweighed by emissions.
SustainabilityMixed funding

What keeps it working?

Usage funds a measurable burn and LP fees, but security remains emission-funded. The relevant question is whether fee-funded burns can sustainably offset the issuance required by validators.

Participants

Who provides what—and takes which risk?

Swappers

Receives
Cross-chain execution through the state chain and vaults
Provides
LP fee, network fee, and applicable gas/broker fees
Key risk
Execution price, slippage, and chain-specific settlement conditions.

Liquidity providers

Receives
Pool trading fees
Provides
Assets and active or passive liquidity strategies
Key risk
Inventory risk, adverse selection, and strategy execution.

Validators

Receives
FLIP emissions
Provides
Staked security, vault signing, and state-chain operation
Key risk
Slashing, infrastructure cost, and token-price exposure.

FLIP holders

Receives
Indirect value through buy-and-burn
Provides
Token demand and validator security capital
Key risk
Net issuance may offset burns; no direct cash claim.
Governance surface

Which levers move the money?

Parameters matter because recipient outcomes can change while the headline fee or volume looks unchanged.

Model a change
01

Network fee rate

0.10% base; 0.01% for internal stablecoin swaps, with a minimum

Directly changes trader cost and the FLIP burn rate.

Chainflip protocol governance
02

Validator emissions

Elastic-supply emissions fund network security

Changes validator economics and the net token-supply outcome after burns.

Chainflip protocol governance
Assessment

Strengths, dependencies, unknowns.

Strengths

  • The network fee has a direct, documented value-capture path.
  • LP and token capture are economically separate and measurable.
  • Cross-chain volume provides an observable demand base.

Dependencies

  • Swap volume sufficient to fund meaningful burns.
  • FLIP market liquidity for efficient programmatic purchases.
  • Validator rewards sufficient for a robust signer set.

Still unknown

  • Reconciled 30-day validator issuance in USD and FLIP.
  • Full operating cost of the network and Labs.
  • Sensitivity of routed volume to the network fee.
Model history

The rules changed.
The chart should remember.

0.10% network fee anchors the burn

Current token economics use a fixed swap-value fee to buy and burn FLIP, separating token capture from LP fees.

Burn value visible, issuance still missing

The open adapter exposes fee-funded burn value but reports zero incentives, conflicting with official validator-emission documentation.

Source ledger

Trace the claim.

Rules come from protocol documentation or governance. Amounts come from official APIs or inspectable open adapters. Each has a different job.

01
Chainflip metrics

DefiLlama · Open adapter

30-day fees · revenue · holder revenue
05
Liquidity providers

Chainflip · Official docs

LP role · LP fee income · active and passive strategies